(PC) Mendoza v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JORGE MENDOZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01713-LJO-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND (ECF No. 11) REHABILITATIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
17 Jorge Mendoza (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceedings, filed January 15, 2020. The United States Supreme Court has indicated that “the power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants. How this can best be done calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936). “[T]he proponent of the…