(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:19-cv-00466California626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-00466-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. (ECF Nos. 36, 37) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff's motion to compel, to vacate the court’s prior order, and for sanctions (ECF No. 36) is currently scheduled for hearing on January 22, 2020. Plaintiff also filed a “motion to obtain proof of service” the same day his motion to compel was filed, however, that motion has not been scheduled for a hearing. (ECF No. 37.) Local Rule 251(c) contemplates parties drafting a joint statement one week before a hearing on discovery motions. The parties apparently did not meet and confer, have not provided the court with a joint statement, and plaintiff has not provided the court with an affidavit as to why he could not secure the cooperation of defendants, in violation of Local Rule 251. Accordingly, to the extent plaintiff seeks to compel discovery production the court DENIES plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.