(HC) Roberson v. Sacramento County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:19-cv-02325California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARLON ROBERSON, No. 2:19-cv-02325-TLN-GGH Petitioner, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner Marlon Roberson (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a 18 petition for writ of mandamus. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 5, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) Petitioner has 23 filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 5.) 24 This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which 25 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 26 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.