(PC) Stine v. Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:18-cv-00684California315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKEAL GLENN STINE, No. 2:18-cv-00684-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Mikael Glenn Stine (“Plaintiff”), federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 16, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 55.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.