Dillion

(PS) Chatman v. Dillion

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:20-cv-00019California1,777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LARRY ALONZO CHATMAN, No. 2:20-cv-00019 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

NANCY DILLION, Solano County Public Defender., 16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, alleges a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF Nos. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.