(PC) Langley v. Well Path Medical

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:19-cv-01022California1,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER J. LANGLEY, No. 2:19-cv-01022-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELL PATH MEDICAL, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Christopher J. Langley’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 17), in which Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Order adopting the Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute and Judgment (ECF Nos. 11–13). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on May 28, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On June 17, 2019, the magistrate judge ordered Plaintiff to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days in order to resolve the fee status for this case. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was warned that his failure to resolve the fee status may result in the dismissal of his action pursuant to Local Rule 110 for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.