Biter

(PC) Baca v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20201:15-cv-01916California2,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK BACA, Case No. 1:15-cv-01916-DAD-JDP (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO

PARTICIPATE IN SCHEDULING

LARRY DILEO, et al., SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN GOOD

FAITH

Defendants.

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

16 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Frank Baca, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on December 28, 2015. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened and found to state a cognizable claim against three unnamed defendants. (ECF No. 10.) On February 7, 2017, William Schmidt was selected from the court’s pro bono panel and was appointed to represent Plaintiff in this matter and amended complaints were filed. (ECF No. 12.) Currently, this matter is proceeding on the third amended complaint against Defendants J. Bal, M. Boparai, L. Carmichael, J. Carrick, L. DiLeo, E. Dos…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.