Biter
(PC) Baca v. Biter
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20201:15-cv-01916California2,452 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRANK BACA, Case No. 1:15-cv-01916-DAD-JDP (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO
PARTICIPATE IN SCHEDULING
LARRY DILEO, et al., SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN GOOD
FAITH
Defendants.
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
16 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Frank Baca, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on December 28, 2015. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened and found to state a cognizable claim against three unnamed defendants. (ECF No. 10.) On February 7, 2017, William Schmidt was selected from the court’s pro bono panel and was appointed to represent Plaintiff in this matter and amended complaints were filed. (ECF No. 12.) Currently, this matter is proceeding on the third amended complaint against Defendants J. Bal, M. Boparai, L. Carmichael, J. Carrick, L. DiLeo, E. Dos…