Agustin Benitez v. Western Milling, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20201:18-cv-01484California10,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGUSTIN BENITEZ, CARLOS No. 1:18-cv-01484-SKO MORALES, and STEVEN VILLAREAL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT v. (Doc. 33)

WESTERN MILLING, LLC, KRUSE

INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., and

PERFECTION PET FOODS, LLC,

17 Defendants.

19 On November 8, 2019, Plaintiffs Agustin Benitez, Carlos Morales, and Steven Villareal, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class settlement. (Doc. 33.) The Court reviewed Plaintiffs’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California’s Local Rule 230(g). The hearing set for December 11, 2019, was therefore VACATED. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.