Starace

Starace v. Lexington Law Firm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20201:18-cv-01596California188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN STARACE, individually and on behalf ) Case No. 1:18-cv-01596-DAD-SKO of all others similarly situated, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK Plaintiff, ) OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE ) v. ) (Doc. 28) ) LEXINGTON LAW FIRM, and DOES 1 through ) 10, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 15 On January 16, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff Martin Starace’s individual claims with prejudice, and the putative class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 28.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff’s individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.