Davis

(DP) Contreras v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20201:19-cv-01523California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORGE CONTRERAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01523-AWI-SAB

Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE

v. ORDER THAT COUNSEL SHOW CAUSE

WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

RONALD DAVIS, Warden of California State IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY THE Prison at San Quentin, COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER 15 Respondent. Deadline to Respond: January 22, 2020 16 17 A review of the record in this action reveals that Petitioner Jorge Contreras through counsel Brian Pomerantz and Ken Murray and Respondent Warden Ron Davis through counsel Deputy Attorneys General Kenneth Sokoler and Christina Hitomi Simpson have not complied with the Court’s January 16, 2020 deadline to file a case management conference joint statement. (See Doc. No. 14 at 2-3.) Additionally, a review of eVoucher reveals that Petitioner through counsel Pomerantz and Murray have not complied with the Court’s January 16, 2020 deadline to submit an initial case budget and supporting documentation. (Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.