Perez
(PC) O'Connor v. Perez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN O’CONNOR, No. 2:18-cv-1057 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. PEREZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for clarification (ECF No. 51) and motion for third party subpoenas (ECF No. 52). For the reasons set forth below the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for clarification and deny the motion for third party subpoenas. I. Motion for Clarification Plaintiff requests clarification regarding the operative complaint in this action. (ECF No. 51.) Plaintiff states that he and defendants are using different terms to refer to the operative complaint. After service was ordered, but before defendants appeared in this action, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.) The court ordered the amended…