(CONSENT) Frost v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS FROST and KATHRYN No. 2:17-cv-2428 DB
FROST,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. 17 On March 22, 2019, this action was reassigned to the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 12.) Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss submitted on May 10, 2019. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs commenced this action on October 13, 2017, by filing a complaint in the Placer County Superior Court. (Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 8.1) The complaint alleges that plaintiffs are residents and owners of real property located in Lincoln, California, (“Property”). (Id.) Plaintiffs 27 1 Page number citations such as this one are to the page number reflected on the court’s CM/ECF 28 …