Allenby
(PC) Ring v. Allenby
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW ARLINGTON RING, Case No.: 1:18-cv-01283-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CASE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
COURT’S ORDER
B. PRICE, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
16 On November 12, 2019, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state cognizable claims and granting him leave to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 14.) On December 6, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff a 30-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 16.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file a second amended complaint or to otherwise comply with Court’s screening order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power of…