Chenalo

(PC) Thomas v. Chenalo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20201:19-cv-01185California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT EUGENE THOMAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01185-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PAYMENT OF

FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

CAPTAIN CHENALO, et al., DAYS Defendants. ECF No. 2 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS ORDER TO ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT

JUDGE

19 20 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought 21 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 16, 2019, plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma 22 pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. 23 The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that “[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil 24 action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or 25 detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was 26 dismissed on the grounds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.