D'Agostini

(PC) Center v. D'Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20202:19-cv-00091California2,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STEVEN ROGER CENTER, No. 2:19-cv-0091 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D’AGSTINI, et al.,1 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 12. Plaintiff has also filed a motion requesting “pro se status and privileges.” ECF No. 13. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). For the reasons stated below, the court will deny plaintiff’s first-filed motion to proceed in forma pauperis and grant the second. The court will also deny plaintiff’s motion to receive “pro se status and privileges.” The complaint is screened herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), and found to state a claim. Service will be directed by separate order.

The name of the Sheriff of El…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.