(PC) McKissick v. Amador County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20202:19-cv-01807California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT DANIEL McKISSICK, No. 2:19-cv-1807 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed December 4, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this action. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.