Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNELL DAVIS, No. 2:19-cv-1976-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M. FELDER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2019, the court determined that service of the complaint is appropriate for defendants Harris and Crook, but not for defendant Felder. ECF No. 8. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with his Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims and First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Harris and Crook or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claims against defendants Harris and Crook. See ECF No. 11. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Felder be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are…