Castrillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROME ROBERT DENNIS, No. 2:19-cv-0828-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CASTRILLO, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2019, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, a viable First Amendment retaliation claim against defendants Castrillo and John Doe, but had not alleged any viable claims against defendant Avsdin. ECF No. 12. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the claim against defendants Castrillo and John Doe or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claim against defendants Castrillo and John Doe. See ECF No. 15. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Avsdin be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and…