Lemos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN OBASOHAN, No. 2:19-cv-01557 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PETER LEMOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has paid the filing fee. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On August 12, 2019, a scheduling order was issued in this case ordering the plaintiff to serve a copy of the scheduling order and complete service of process on defendants within 90 days of filing the complaint. ECF No. 2 at 1. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to complete service within 90 days may result in dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 40(m). Id. The deadline passed, and no certificate of service was filed. On January 6, 2020, the court issued an order to show cause no later than January 20, 2020 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 7. The order specified…