Kelso

(PC) McCoy v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20201:12-cv-00983California798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) RECONSIDERATION, FILED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 STRONACH, et al., ) ) [ECF No. 159] Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, filed on September 13, 2019. Defendants filed an opposition on October 7, 2019, and Plaintiff filed a reply on October 18, 2019. (ECF Nos. 173, 184.) Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s August 22, 2019, order denying his motion to compel. (ECF No. 149.) I. DISCUSSION Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs relief from orders of the district court. The Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.