Hoshino

(PC) Eckstrom v. Hoshino

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20202:16-cv-00538California759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL ECKSTROM, No. 2:16-cv-00538-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARTIN HOSHINO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Carl Eckstrom (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 27, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 26.) On September 13, 2018, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff has since filed a Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 31), a Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 32), and a Motion for Ruling on Objections to Findings and Recommendations (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.