Kraus

(PC) Bradford v. Kraus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20202:19-cv-01753California1,532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:19-cv-1753 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PAUL R. KRAUS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that his rights were violated in connection with a 2019 Keyhea1 hearing. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3). For the reasons set forth below the court will recommend that the motion be denied. IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUTE The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) permits a federal court to authorize the commencement and prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit indicating that the person is unable to pay such fees. However, [i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.