(PC) Law v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS GILBERT LAW, No. 2:17-cv-2060 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and LORI W. AUSTIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case proceeds on the Operative First Amended Complaint docketed September 13, 2019. ECF No. 23. On November 6, 2019, defendants filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to the “three strikes rule” of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 30. Plaintiff opposes revocation of his IFP status. ECF No. 37. Defendants have filed a reply. ECF No. 38. This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). For the reasons that follow, the undersigned 26 As ordered by this court, ECF No. 24 at 2, the Operative First…