Rojas

(PC) Martinez v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20201:16-cv-01467California521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:16-cv-01467-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDERS

F. ROJAS, (ECF Nos. 52, 55, 57, 59) Defendant.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Antonio Martinez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 10, 2019, Defendant F. Rojas filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 52.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir.1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir.1988). (ECF No. 52-1.) On October 9, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff a thirty-day extension of time to file an 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.