Baldwin

(PC) Garcia v. Baldwin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20201:19-cv-00184California1,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO GARCIA, No. 1:19-cv-00184-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

M BALDWIN, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REQUIRE

PLAINTIFF TO POST SECURITY AS A

Defendants. VEXATIOUS LITIGANT, AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S COUNTERMOTION FOR

SANCTIONS (Doc. Nos. 13, 21, 29) 18 19 Plaintiff Guillermo Garcia is a state prisoner currently proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 23, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion to require plaintiff to post security as a vexatious litigant (Doc. No. 13) be denied. (Doc. No. 21.) Specifically, the magistrate judge found that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.