Weiss

(PC) Ramos v. Weiss

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20202:19-cv-01468California319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN RAMOS, No. 2:19-cv-01468-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEAN WEISS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Benjamin Ramos (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 26, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.