(PS) State of California v. Ingram El

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., No. 2:19-cv-0560 KJM DB PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER MICHAEL INGRAM EL, Defendant. 16 Defendant Michael Ingram El is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 17, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on defendant and which contained notice to defendant that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and defendant has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the docket that defendant’s copy of the findings and recommendations were returned as undeliverable, defendant was properly served. It is the defendant’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of…