Sherman

(PC) Pena v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20201:18-cv-01527California483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFREDO RUDY PENA, 1:18-cv-01527-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

v. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM,

STUART SHERMAN, et al., FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER, AND

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (ECF No. 9.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

18 Alfredo Rudy Pena (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On September 16, 2019, the court screened the Complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 6.) On October 21, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 7.) On December 11, 2019, the court screened the First Amended Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.