Conti

Conti v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20201:19-cv-00769California9,815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 ANGELA CONTI and JUSTINE MORA, No. 1:19-cv-00769-LJO-SKO individuals, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT L’OREAL USA S/D, INC., a Corporation, OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS Defendant. (Doc. 9)

17 18 On November 12, 2019, Plaintiffs Angela Conti and Justine Mora, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement. (Doc. 9.) The motion was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for findings and recommendation pursuant to U.S.C. § 636(b). The undersigned reviewed Plaintiffs’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.