Driver
Driver v. Pape Kenworth
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROGER DRIVER, No. 2:17-CV-01968-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER & PAPE TRUCKS, INC., PROPOSED PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER
14 Defendant.
16 PAPE TRUCKS, INC., Third Party Plaintiff, v. 20 JOMAR INVESTMENTS, INC. et. al., 21 Third Party Defendants.
23 THE FOLLOWING IS A PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PARTIES. THE COURT INTENDS TO ENTER AN ORDER SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THIS PROPOSED ORDER. BUT IN LIGHT OF THE STATUS CONFERENCE THE COURT SCHEDULES BELOW, IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR ALL PARTIES TO KNOW WHAT TIMELINES AND REQUIREMENTS THE COURT INTENDS TO ORDER. On October 10, 2019, the court conducted a status (pretrial scheduling) conference and hearing on third party defendant Jomar Investment, Inc.’s (Jomar) motion to dismiss in this matter. (ECF No. 40.) The court granted Jomar’s motion to dismiss, but gave Pape Trunks, Inc. (Pape) leave to amend its third-party complaint. (ECF No. 40.) The…