Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 H. DYMITRI HARASZEWSKI, No. 2:13-cv-2494 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KNIPP, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants retaliated against him, interfered with his mail, placed him in segregation as a punitive measure, and deprived him of his property. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint, plaintiff’s motion to require the prison to make copies, and defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to comply with discovery. For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend plaintiff’s motion to amend be denied, will deny without prejudice plaintiff’s motion for copies, and will grant defendants’ motion to compel. BACKGROUND I. Allegations of the Third Amended Complaint This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s third…