(PS) Sharma v. City of Redding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NARENDRA SHARMA, ASSIGNEE OF No. 2:19-cv-0601 TLN DB PS

SHREE SHIVA LLC,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. CITY OF REDDING, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Narendra Sharma is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 22.) For the reasons stated below, defendant Richardson Griswold’s motion to dismiss is denied as having been rendered moot. Moreover, the undersigned finds that defendants City of Redding, Debra Wright, and James Wright’s, (“City of Redding defendants”), motion to dismiss should be granted, plaintiff’s second amended complaint dismissed without further leave to amend, and this action closed. BACKGROUND …