Sherman

(PC) Austin v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20201:18-cv-01630California2,276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMPSON S. AUSTIN, Case No. 1:18-cv-01630-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT STU SHERMAN, et al., (ECF No. 15) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 Plaintiff Sampson S. Austin (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on August 20, 2019, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 15.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.