Quillen

(PC) Harris v. Quillen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20201:17-cv-01370California1,597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, No. 1:17-cv-01370-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

T. QUILLEN, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REQUIRE

PLAINTIFF TO POST SECURITY AS A

Defendants. VEXATIOUS LITIGANT (Doc. Nos. 33, 48) 17 Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 27, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion to require plaintiff to post security as a vexatious litigant (Doc. No. 33) be denied. (Doc. No. 48.) Specifically, the magistrate judge found that defendants relied solely on California law to argue the plaintiff was a vexatious litigant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.