Matevousian

(PC) Benanti v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20201:17-cv-01556California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BENANTI, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01556-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

) MATEVOUSIAN, JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ) MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT Defendants. ) ) [ECF Nos. 68, 82, 85, 87] ) ) )

Plaintiff Michael Benanti is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 17, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. (ECF No. 85.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.