Moore

Moore v. JP Morgan Chase Bank,N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20201:18-cv-00926California204 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DAVID MOORE, Case No. 1:18-cv-00926-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO CLOSE CASE TO REFLECT

v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 22) 16 On January 27, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice 18 and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 22.) In light of the stipulation of 19 the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson v. City of San 20 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 21 award of costs or attorney’s fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 23 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.