Magdy

(PC) Calderon v. Magdy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20201:19-cv-01734California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE GUADALUPE CALDERON, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01734-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER VACATING JANUARY 9, 2020 v. ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF ONE FINAL

MAGDY DANIALS, et.al., ) OPPORTUNITY TO FILE A SECOND ) AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. ) ) [ECF Nos. 9, 12, 14] ) ) )

Plaintiff Jose Guadalupe Calderon is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed the instant case on December 12, 2019. On December 19, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found he failed to state any cognizable claims, and granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on January 6, 2020. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.