Wiley

Wiley v. Goodman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20201:19-cv-01407California369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANOTHONY WILEY, SR., ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-1407 - LJO - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING v. ) THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) ROBERT GOODMAN, et al., ) (Doc. 4) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Anthony Wiley, Sr. asserts the defendants are liable for a violation of the Privacy Act of 1974, hate crime against a disabled American, judicial misconduct, judicial corruption, and RICO violation. (See generally Doc. 1) Because Plaintiff failed to comply with the Local Rules and failed to prosecute this action, the magistrate judge recommended the complaint be dismissed without prejudice on January 7, 2020. Plaintiff was given fourteen days to file any objections to the recommendations that the action be dismissed. (Doc. 4) In addition, he was “advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.