Huckleberry

(PC) Roberts v. Huckleberry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20201:18-cv-01237California851 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01237-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR CASE STATUS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

SGT. HUCKLEBERRY, et al., (ECF No. 51) Defendants. 14 Plaintiff David Nathaniel Roberts is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s letter, filed on January 27, 2020. (ECF No. 51.) In his letter, Plaintiff requests an update on this case and appointment of counsel to help represent him. (Id.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s letter as a motion for case status and a motion for appointment of counsel. Initially, with regards to Plaintiff’s motion for case status, the Court reminds Plaintiff that, generally, the Court will not respond in writing to individual inquiries regarding the status of a case. (ECF No. 4, at 3-4.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.