Valinken

(HC) Mendez-Barocio v. Valinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20201:19-cv-01319California518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN MENDEZ-BAROCIO, No. 1:19-cv-01319-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO ACCEPT

LATE REPLY TO GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE (Doc. 16) 14 v. ORDER CONSTRUING MOTION TO ALLOW SUPPLEMENT AS REPLY TO ANSWER [Doc. 17]

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO

RICHARD VALINKEN, et al., FILE COMPLETED CONSENT/DECLINE

FORM

Respondents. (FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE)

20 Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On September 20, 2019, Petitioner filed a habeas petition in this Court. (Doc. 1.) On September 25, 2019, the Court issued a scheduling order directing Respondent to file a response and providing Petitioner the option to file a reply. (Doc. 9.) On December 23, 2019, Respondent filed a response to the petition. (Doc. 15.) Pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.