(PC) Curry v. California Forensic Medical Group

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HENRY CURRY, No. 2:18-cv-2513 KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA FORENSIC, et al. Defendants. 16 On December 20, 2019, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. On December 20, 2019, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). (ECF No. 24 at 3.) Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 27 …