(HC) Godfrey v. Warden PBSP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20201:19-cv-01197California941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA MICHAEL GODFREY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01197-LJO-JDP Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

v. CORPUS, SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE,

AND DIRECTING SERVICE OF

WARDEN PBSP, DOCUMENTS Respondent. ECF No. 1 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

TO APPOINT COUNSEL

17 ECF No. 2 18 19 Petitioner Joshua Michael Godfrey, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter is before the court for preliminary review. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must examine the habeas corpus petition and order a response to the petition unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. It does not plainly appear that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, we order the government to respond to the petition, set a briefing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.