(HC)Langley

(HC)Langley v. On Habeas Corpus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20201:19-cv-00547California837 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY LANGLEY, No. 1:19-cv-00547-DAD-EPG (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

RAYTHEL FISHER, RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

Respondent. CORPUS (Doc. Nos. 11, 15) 17 Petitioner Randy Langley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304. On June 28, 2019, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as untimely. (Doc. No. 11.) On September 24, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and that the court dismiss the pending petition as being barred by the applicable statute of limitations1 based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.