Reed

(PC) Melvin L. Eddington v. Reed

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20202:19-cv-00712California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MELVIN L. EDDINGTON, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-0712-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. REED, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests appointment of counsel as well as an extension of time to file his amended complaint pursuant to the court’s December 12, 2019 order. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.