Martinez

(PC) Morgan v. Martinez

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20201:18-cv-01047California235 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 WAYNE DANIEL MORGAN, Case No. 1:18-cv-01047-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH

v. PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) M. G. MARTINEZ, (ECF No. 28) Defendant. 10 On January 29, 2020, Plaintiff Wayne Daniel Morgan and Defendant M. G. Martinez filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 28.) The stipulation further states that each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides, in relevant part, that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing … a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” In this case, since Plaintiff and Defendant’s counsel signed and dated the stipulation of dismissal, the filing of the stipulation “automatically terminate[d] the action[.]” Wilson v. City of San Jose,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.