Sullivan

(PC) Guillen v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20201:19-cv-00957California2,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCOS CASEY GUILLEN, III, Case No. 1:19-cv-00957-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

v.

30-DAY DEADLINE SULLIVAN, Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S STATE-LAW

CLAIMS

21-DAY DEADLINE

Clerk of Court to assign a District Judge

Defendant Sullivan has removed this action from state to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1441. (Doc. 1.) In his complaint, Plaintiff Marcos Casey Guillen, III, alleges violations of the Fourteenth Amendment and state regulations. (See Doc. 1 at 6-13.) The Court has original and supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. sections 1331, 1343, and 1367. Defendant requests that the Court screen Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915A. (Doc. 1 at 2.) Because Plaintiff is a state prisoner seeking relief against a state actor, screening is mandatory in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.