Motaghedi
Motaghedi v. Blinken
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20201:19-cv-01466California10,211 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SEYED AMIN SAM MOTAGHEDI, et al., 1:19-cv-01466-LJO-SKO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
v. TO DISMISS
MICHAEL R. POMPEO, et al., (ECF No. 29)
Defendants.
I. INTRODUCTION
On October 15, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that Defendants withheld adjudications
of case-by-case waivers of Presidential Proclamation 9645, Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and
Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety
Threats (“PP 9645”). See ECF No. 1 ¶ 1. Plaintiffs raise claims under the Administrative Procedure Act
(“APA”), as well as claims for mandamus relief, deprivation of procedural due process, and Equal
Protection under the Fifth Amendment. See generally ECF No. 1.
On October 25, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. See ECF No. 10.