Alencastre

(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20202:17-cv-01326California1,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, No. 2:17-cv-1326-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES MARSHALS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an action arising under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). She currently proceeds with an Eighth Amendment claim for alleged sexual assault against defendant Alencastre. See ECF Nos. 73, 77, & 92. On September 3, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion to amend which sought primarily to reinstitute claims that the court had already screened out. ECF No. 101. The court recommended that motion be denied based on: (1) the length of time this case has already been pending; (2) plaintiff’s lengthy and troubled history of filing numerous motions to amend; and (3) the scattershot nature of plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint. ECF No. 106. Those recommendations were adopted in full by the district judge. ECF No. 113. After the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.