(PS) Jones v. Liberty Mutual
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN LLOYD JONES, No. 2:19-cv-02049-MCE-KJN (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
v. AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND
LIBERTY MUTUAL, et al., (ECF Nos. 15, 16) Defendants. 16 This case concerns a dispute between Plaintiff and his insurer, Liberty Mutual, as well as two claims adjusters, Amber Cruz and Stephen Tognetti (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff asserts Defendants failed to pay the full amount owed to him related to a 2014 claim for stolen property (ECF Nos. 7, 12, 13), and then improperly filed a temporary restraining order against him when he attempted to pursue reimbursement (ECF No. 16). Defendants have moved to dismiss the contract claims as time–barred, and assert Plaintiff’s claims concerning a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) are barred by California’s Anti–SLAPP laws.1 For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Defendants’ motion…