Unknown

(HC) Moreland v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20202:19-cv-02290California399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH D. MORELAND, No. 2:19-cv-02290 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). On November 12, 2019, petitioner filed a motion for extension of time to file his writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. On December 9, 2019, the court denied the motion for extension of time and granted petitioner thirty days from the date of the order to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the required filing fee and file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to properly commence his federal habeas action. ECF No. 3. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with the court’s order and deadlines would result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. Id. at 3. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s orders,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.